Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Strategic Mission Planning & Execution System (SMPES)

Air ForceRDT&EReconciledPE0304100F
What it is
Strategic Mission Planning & Execution System (SMPES) (0304100F) is an Air Force research & development line funded in the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force account. Its J-book detail breaks the line into 2 projects.
What changed
+$5.72M FY25→26 R-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No company is linked to this line. Award records do not carry the program element, so the crosswalk is silent here — why.

Budget figures

FY24 Actuals
$62.8MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Total
$69.4MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$75.2MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
+$5.72MR-1 TOA · PB2026
Data coverage

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget trajectory

The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $62.8MFY25: $69.4MFY26: $75.2MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$62.8M
FY25$69.4M
FY26$75.2M

All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view

P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition

5 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2022–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span, and 1 year is a break in the line rather than a low value: an edition the program is absent from, never interpolated. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
5 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2022–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span, and 1 year is a break in the line rather than a low value: an edition the program is absent from, never interpolated. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$0–$62.8M
Enacted–$0$64.9M$69.4M
Request––$64.9M$69.4M$75.2M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2024 book requested $64.9M for FY2024; the PB2026 book reported $62.8M as actual total obligation authority — $2.14M below the request. 62.8 − 64.9 = -2.1 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission — Strategic Mission Planning & Execution System (SMPES)

This budget line funds the SMPES PE. Legacy PEs 0101324F ISPAN and 0301112F NPES and NLCC DSS have been consolidated into one SMPES PE 0304100F. The SMPES PE is comprised of two Budget, Program, and Activity Codes (BPAC): the SMPES software acquisition program and the NLCC DSS software acquisition program. SMPES is an integrated enterprise solution software system providing the U.S. Air Force (USAF) and U.S. strategic nuclear forces' principal nuclear planning and analysis tools; including tools for consequence analysis and deliberate, adaptive, and crisis action planning for strategic deterrence. SMPES consolidates the following six independently managed programs into one system: 1) Mission Planning and Analysis System (MPAS); 2) Global Adaptive Planning Collaborative Information Environment (GAP-CIE); 3) NLCC DSS - Nuclear Command and Control (NC2) Conference Module; 4) NPES Recapitalization (NPES Recap); 5) Force Status Readiness (FSR); and 6) Force Survivability Analysis and Management (FSAM). MPAS provides comprehensive global strike, coordinated space and missile defense, and information operations capabilities to meet strategic deterrent and national security objectives. MPAS consists of multiple sub-applications, working together to provide senior leaders with a strategic planning capability to U.S. Strategic Command (USSTRATCOM) leadership and war planners. MPAS software is utilized to develop Joint Staff Level I - IV nuclear and conventional attack options for national and theater requirements, by conducting continuous agile software development for classified and unclassified networks. Located at USSTRATCOM, MPAS supports the Unified Command Plan and Nuclear Posture Review. GAP-CIE is a web-based, collaborative, joint operation planning (JOP) application that enables combatant commanders and strategic leaders to rapidly coordinate on course of action development. The GAP-CIE planning environment provides deliberative planning, crisis action planning, decision support tools, and the Global Situational Awareness Tool (GSAT) supporting combatant commanders' visualization of geospatial, temporal, and relational planning data. NLCC DSS develops and delivers software to directly support strategic leaders in time critical national events. NLCC DSS will improve situational awareness of threats to the U.S. and its Allies, aggregate strategic-level information, and provide response options in a common, resilient, and mobile visual display capability. Nuclear Planning and Execution System Recapitalization (NPES Recap) develops software to facilitate Nuclear Command and Control (NC2) adaptive planning and execution at fixed and mobile sites in real time. NPES Recap provides communication interfaces with software development, data management, software re-engineering, and operations to include requirements validation and training. Force Status Readiness (FSR) provides decision-makers and planners with real-time status of U.S. nuclear forces and stores information related to the U.S. Strategic Command (USSTRATCOM) NC2 mission enabling combatant commanders the ability to monitor the status of forces to include missiles, aircraft, submarines, and key personnel. Force Survivability Analysis and Management (FSAM) enables the Warning System Controller (WSC) to monitor the status of all USSTRATCOM assigned forces to include but not limited to: 1) tracking the location of hostile threat aircraft and missile systems; 2) processing and displaying potential U.S. force vulnerabilities; and 3) providing force management/force survival (FM/FS) analysis tools to USSTRATCOM senior leaders. This program element may include necessary civilian pay expenses required to manage, execute, and deliver weapon systems capability. The use of such programs funds would be in addition to the civilian pay expenses budgeted in PE 0605833F. The FY2026 request was reduced by $0.073 million for Advisory and Assistance Services to promote efficiencies and advance the policies of the Administration in alignment with Executive Order 14222, "Implementing the President's Department of Government Efficiency Cost Efficiency Initiative.” This program is in Budget Activity 7, Operational System Development because this budget activity includes development efforts to upgrade systems that have been fielded or have received approval for full rate production and anticipate production funding in the current or subsequent fiscal year.

Mission — NLCC Decision Support System

This budget line funds the National Leadership Command Capability (NLCC) Decision Support Service (DSS). NLCC DSS will develop and deliver software to directly support strategic leaders in time critical national events. NLCC DSS will improve situational awareness of threats to the U.S. and its Allies, aggregate strategic-level information, and provide response options in a common, resilient, and mobile visual display capability. NLCC DSS is developing conference modules that will directly support senior leaders with a common visual display to enhance national-level situational awareness and strategic-level decision making. The program includes the Nuclear Command and Control (NC2) Conference Module that will be integrated into the Strategic Mission Planning and Execution System (SMPES) enterprise architecture as well as at least two additional follow-on conference modules to support other mission areas and Combatant Commands. These additional conference modules are not expected to be a part of the SMPES enterprise architecture.

Mission — Strategic Mission Planning & Execution System

Strategic Mission Planning and Execution System (SMPES) will be the U.S. Air Force (USAF) and U.S. strategic nuclear forces' principal nuclear planning and analysis tool for accessing consequence analysis information and strategic deterrence. SMPES consolidates the following six independently managed programs into one system: 1) Mission Planning and Analysis System (MPAS); 2) Global Adaptive Planning Collaborative Information Environment (GAP-CIE); 3) Decision Support Service (DSS) - Nuclear Command and Control (NC2) Conference Module; 4) Nuclear Planning and Execution System Recapitalization (NPES Recap); 5) Force Status Readiness (FSR); and 6) Force Survivability Analysis and Management (FSAM).

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (2)

National Leadership Command Capability Decision Support Service (NLCC DSS) - Conference Module Development

Funds will be used for the development, integration, and test activities of NLCC DSS conference modules

Strategic Mission Planning and Execution System (SMPES)

Funds will be used for the development, integration, test, and fielding activities of nuclear command, control, and communications (NC3) enterprise solutions

Budget line items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY24 Actuals$62.8M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY25 Enacted$69.4M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY25 Total$69.4M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY26 Disc. Request$75.2M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY26 Total$75.2M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$0$62.8M$69.4M$75.2M$75.2M
674212: NLCC Decision Support System$0$9.36M$11.9M$11.7M$11.7M
675029: Strategic Mission Planning & Execution System$0$53.4M$57.5M$63.5M$63.5M

Follow the dollar

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 312 of 1,938 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Awards

No awards are linked to this program element at high or medium confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.

Lobbying mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Strategic Mission Planning & Execution System (SMPES). No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

Program dossier

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →

Primary sources

Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.

Budget totals · TOA sources

Detailed budget justification

The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.