Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Information Systems Security Program

DISARDT&EPartial Reconciliation0303140K
What it is
Information Systems Security Program (0303140K) is a DISA research & development line funded in the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide account. Its J-book detail breaks the line into 1 project.
What changed
-$8.19M FY25→26 R-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No award linkage at high confidence.

Budget Figures

FY24 Actuals
$8.03MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Total
$31.4MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$23.2MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
-$8.19MR-1 TOA · PB2026

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget Trajectory
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order so the direction of travel is readable at a glance: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order so the direction of travel is readable at a glance: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $8.03MFY25: $31.4MFY26: $23.2MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$8.03M
FY25$31.4M
FY26$23.2M

All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view — P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
10 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2017–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
10 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2017–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2017 actuals — PB2019 editionFY2018 actuals — PB2020 editionFY2019 actuals — PB2021 editionFY2020 actuals — PB2022 editionFY2021 actuals — PB2023 editionFY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2018 enacted — PB2019 editionFY2019 enacted — PB2020 editionFY2020 enacted — PB2021 editionFY2021 enacted — PB2022 editionFY2022 enacted — PB2023 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2019 request — PB2019 editionFY2020 request — PB2020 editionFY2021 request — PB2021 editionFY2022 request — PB2022 editionFY2023 request — PB2023 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$0$0$42.3M$39.8M$6.22M$5.71M$6.72M$8.03M
Enacted$0$19.6M$40.4M$8.92M$5.71M$6.97M$8.35M$31.4M
Request$19.6M$42.8M$8.92M$5.71M$7.00M$8.35M$31.4M$23.2M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2019 book requested $19.6M for FY2019; the PB2021 book reported $42.3M as actual total obligation authority — $22.7M above the request. 42.319.6 = 22.7 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program Lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission Information Systems Security Program

Cyber Security & Analytics enables mission operations for global partners and the warfighter by providing communications through the delivery of optimized cyber infrastructure solutions. The intent is to be dominant in providing strategic and innovative cyber infrastructure to support Department of Defense (DoD) missions. Cyber Security & Analytics ensures enterprise services evolve support for a joint information assurance model. The joint information assurance model manages risks related to the use, storage, and transmission of information and supports a broad range of information sharing policies across the unclassified and classified communities. The enhancements to SIPRNet and its enablers will help to secure devices on the network. Cyber Security & Analytics will: • Test and develop active defensive capabilities. • Test and integrate software defined networking and orchestration closed-loop security, which through analytics, monitors and assesses network activities to improve network performance and mitigate negative network occurrences. • Perform research, development, and engineering of emerging cyber situational awareness technologies. • Improve the network performance by providing architecture support, systems engineering and analytical functions.

Mission Information Systems Security Program

Cyber Security & Analytics enables mission operations for global partners and the warfighter by providing communications through the delivery of optimized cyber infrastructure solutions. The intent is to be dominant in providing strategic and innovative cyber infrastructure to support Department of Defense (DoD) missions. Cyber Security & Analytics ensures enterprise services support a joint information assurance model. The joint information assurance model mitigates risks related to the use, storage, and transmission of information and supports a broad range of information sharing policies across the unclassified and classified communities. Cyber Security & Analytics will: • Test and develop active defensive capabilities. • Test and integrate software defined networking and orchestration closed-loop security, which through analytics, monitors and assesses network activities to improve network performance and mitigate negative network occurrences. • Perform research, development, and engineering of emerging cyber situational awareness technologies. • Improve the network performance by providing architecture support, systems engineering and analytical functions.

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (5)

Automation Technical Integration and Engineering in Cyberspace

This program provides research and development, conducts technology assessments, and provides data to drive real time automation integration decisions and enterprise solutions, ultimately improving the user experience. As DISA moves towards a shared transparency of understanding, automation of technical solutions promotes increased information sharing and improved understanding of interdependencies underlying service operations and mission activities. Emerging information technology must support the current and next-generation warfighters to ensure systems are protected while also leveraging advances in automation to deliver capabilities. Ultimately, these efforts support the achievement of an optimized IT environment to protect against threats in cyberspace that remain dynamic and persistent.

Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA)

The ZTA project supports the effort to create a Zero Trust Commercial Cloud Lab (ZTCCL). The ZTCCL is an environment that provides an integration space to develop, test, and mature concepts, capabilities, and technology to benefit the DoD Information Network (DoDIN). These concepts, capabilities, and technologies will increase the DoDIN’s ability to prevent, detect, respond, and recover from malicious cyber activities while proving scalability to enterprise levels. The ZTCCL will: • Provide a test and development environment to test ZT capabilities within a cloud lab environment. • Provide automations for customer research and development with an activity template to include standard IT domain builds, three tiered applications that improve scalability and availability, and "Gold images" that provide a consistent system baseline for common Operating Systems deployments. The ZT project stemmed from a FY 2018 initial Zero Trust Reference Architecture effort with US Cyber Command, NSA, and DoD-CIO.

Public Key Infrastructure (PKI)

Provide non-reputable digital identities of users, devices, applications, and services for both DoD and external mission partners using hardware and software-based certificate/key pairs, and a suite of capabilities that uses interoperable industry standards (OCSP/CRLs) to enable real-time revocation status of those identities. Enable secure communication at OSI 5/6.

Endpoint License and Support

DISA, at the request of the United States Strategic Command (USSTRATCOM) and in support of National Security goals established by the President, has purchased a capability from industry that takes data from Endpoint tools and centralizes it for monitoring and roll up for all Endpoint Security System (ESS) solution(s). This solution will provide data points for network administrators and security personnel with intelligence to prevent, detect, track, report, and remediate malicious computer-related activities and incidents across all DoD networks and information systems.

SIPRNet Endpoint Management

DISA will provide an enterprise Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) suite of tools that will be available to the Department to help secure devices on the network. DISA will invest in people, processes and policy coordination and work with vendors, such as Microsoft and others, to bring Impact Level 5 (IL) security tools over to the Impact Level (IL6) environment that secures the SIPRNet. By porting tools supporting Unified Endpoint Management, DISA and the DoD gain advantages at scale by having a shared UEM solution that ensures endpoints are operating at a common security level across the SIPRNet domain. Without these tools, the enterprise is left to less efficient and disparate methods for updating devices which leads to varying software versions on the network.

Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideDISAFY24 Actuals$8.03M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideDISAFY25 Enacted$31.4M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideDISAFY25 Total$31.4M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideDISAFY26 Disc. Request$23.2M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideDISAFY26 Total$23.2M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget Figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$100.7M$8.03M$31.4M$23.2M$23.2M
IA3: Information Systems Security Program$100.7M$8.03M$31.4M$23.2M$23.2M

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 1,741 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Awards

No awards are linked to this program element at high confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.

Lobbying Mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Information Systems Security Program — no program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →