Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Defense Info Infrastructure Engineering and Integration

DISARDT&EPartial Reconciliation0302019K
What it is
Defense Info Infrastructure Engineering and Integration (0302019K) is a DISA research & development line funded in the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide account. Its J-book detail breaks the line into 2 projects.
What changed
+$3.32M FY25→26 R-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No award linkage at high confidence.

Budget Figures

FY24 Actuals
$18.8MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Total
$12.8MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$16.2MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
+$3.32MR-1 TOA · PB2026

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget Trajectory
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order so the direction of travel is readable at a glance: this line ends lower than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order so the direction of travel is readable at a glance: this line ends lower than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $18.8MFY25: $12.8MFY26: $16.2MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$18.8M
FY25$12.8M
FY26$16.2M

All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view — P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2015 actuals — PB2017 editionFY2016 actuals — PB2018 editionFY2017 actuals — PB2019 editionFY2018 actuals — PB2020 editionFY2019 actuals — PB2021 editionFY2020 actuals — PB2022 editionFY2021 actuals — PB2023 editionFY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2016 enacted — PB2017 editionFY2017 enacted — PB2018 editionFY2018 enacted — PB2019 editionFY2019 enacted — PB2020 editionFY2020 enacted — PB2021 editionFY2021 enacted — PB2022 editionFY2022 enacted — PB2023 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2017 request — PB2017 editionFY2018 request — PB2018 editionFY2019 request — PB2019 editionFY2020 request — PB2020 editionFY2021 request — PB2021 editionFY2022 request — PB2022 editionFY2023 request — PB2023 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY15FY18FY20FY22FY24FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$12.7M$9.73M$18.4M$20.1M$13.5M$10.8M$17.1M$17.7M$18.7M$18.8M
Enacted$10.1M$18.0M$21.6M$16.1M$10.8M$16.3M$16.2M$19.1M$19.3M$12.8M
Request$18.0M$21.6M$16.6M$15.8M$16.3M$16.2M$19.1M$19.3M$12.8M$16.2M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2020 book requested $15.8M for FY2020; the PB2022 book reported $10.8M as actual total obligation authority — $5.00M below the request. 10.815.8 = -5.0 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program Lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission Defense Info. Infrastructure Engineering and Integration

The Defense Information Infrastructure Engineering and Integration effort encompasses two projects, the Modeling and Simulation End-to-End (E2) Architecture and the DoD Information Network (DoDIN) Systems Support. Within the Modeling and Simulation End-to-End Architecture project, there are two major activities: Modeling and Simulation and Enterprise Architecture. Modeling and Simulation: The Modeling and Simulation activity provides systems engineering and E2E analytical functions for DISA and its customers, ensuring integrated capabilities fulfill warfighter mission requirements. Ongoing beneficiaries of these network modeling, simulation, and analysis capabilities include: • Services and Regional Combatant Commands (COCOMs): Receive modeling analyses and recommendations for architecture changes such as circuit rerouting due to Military Construction and planning for additional sites and the increased capacity for the Pacific theater. • DoD CIO and Services: Receive modeling projections for the utilization of new classified desktop and mobility services to be migrated to cloud environments. • DoD Agencies: Receive training and support on the Joint Communications Simulation System, which is the system used to model network and applications. Additional activity resolves near term (one to three years) high-priority technical issues, as defined by DoD CIO and DISA, that impact operational capabilities, affecting DoDIN E2E interoperability and performance. For example, new DISN Resiliency (HyperCore) architecture, P router removal, Time Division Multiplexing (TDM) Elimination, resolution of poor M365 DoD365-SEC Teams performance or planning for new high bandwidth routers. Additional activities include development and testing of models to simulate planned changes to enterprise services, to include migrating DISA enterprise services to cloud architectures, adding capacity to support new Fourth Estate customers, and completing network changes to support enhanced security. End-to-End (E2E) Architecture: The E2E Architecture effort establishes Enterprise Architecture (EA) development standards, documents and generates needed IT architecture artifacts to provide E2E interoperability and performance analysis, and provides systems engineering support for architecture evolution across DISA. DISA works with its customers to ensure integrated capabilities can fulfill warfighter mission requirements and continuously revises these Enterprise Architectures to meets the needs of the department. Some of the ongoing EA activities and projects include the follow areas: • Create EA development framework, EA taxonomy and associated templates to support agency-wide DoD Architecture Framework (DoDAF)-based architecture development and model-based systems engineering (MBSE) requirements in a standardized, effective way to meet the program and agency mission needs. • Help the DISA develop enterprise level architectures to support its mission critical and high priority projects. Examples of work include the development of the DISA Zero Trust Reference Design (ZTRD) architecture; DISA enterprise Privileged Access Management (PAM) solution architecture development and AoA analysis; DOD 5G architecture documentation, DISA Robotics Process Automation (RPA) architecture; DISA DISN Out-of-band (OOB) Management Network architecture and AoA, and other emerging requirements from the agency senior leaders. • Develop capabilities and automated tools to support E2E architecture assessment and analysis in support of data-driven decisions. Examples of activities include developing automated cybersecurity assessments, architecture assessments for future architectures (e.g. SIPR 2.0), and DISA Common Enterprise Service (CES) analysis and recommendations study. DoD Information Network Systems Engineering Support: The DoDIN Systems Engineering and Support project performs research, development, and experimentation of emerging technologies to fill capability shortfalls and technology gaps. Through conducting Technical Exchange Meetings (TEM) with other DoD components, Program Management Offices, and Technical Directors, DISA identifies gaps and shortfalls, pursues innovative solutions, and engages industry for commercial best practices. The DoDIN Systems Engineering and Support project supports technical system engineering reviews for enterprise products and services and resolves gaps related to Machine Learning/Artificial Intelligence (AI), Classified and Unclassified mobile access, Quantum Resistant Cryptography (the cryptography used to authenticate and secure data-in-transit that is susceptible to attacks), Enterprise Architecture development, Cyber Defense, and other technologies.

Mission Modeling and Simulation and Enterprise Architecture

The Modeling and Simulation activity provides architecture, systems engineering, and E2E analytical functions for DISA and its customers, ensuring integrated capabilities fulfill warfighter mission requirements. Modeling and Simulation activities support the DoD communications planning and investment strategy, to include application performance assessments, contingency planning, network capacity planning and diagnostics, and systems-level modeling and simulation. Efforts provide information awareness for Combatant Commands through application solutions for integrated networks, including DoD’s missions and the Defense Information Systems Network (DISN), by: • Supporting the development and implementation of DoDIN EWSE processes essential to evolving the DoDIN, enabling interoperability, and improving E2E performance for critical DoDIN programs. • Developing standardized systems analyses and integration processes to improve integration across DISA for all DISA-developed communication systems and services to avoid interoperability issues. • Providing underlying modeling, simulation, and analytical support for E2E systems engineering and assessment. The Architecture effort provides interoperability, performance analysis, and systems engineering support for architecture evolution across DISA. DISA works with its customers to ensure integrated capabilities can fulfill warfighter mission requirements and continuously revise these Enterprise Architectures to meet the needs of the department.

Mission DoD Information Network (DODIN) Systems Engineering and Support

The DoD Information Network (DODIN) Systems Engineering and Support project identifies key technology areas that are essential to DISA including Machine Learning/Artificial Intelligence (AI), Mobility, Assured Identity, Rapid Transition, and Cyber Defense, among other technologies. It ensures DISA’s technical strategies align with the DoD IT Efficiency Strategy and the latest Department of Defense Chief Information Office (DoD CIO) Capabilities Planning Guidance (CPG). These strategies establish the foundation for DISA's technology investments and technical development. DISA leverages emerging technology to drive efficiencies and cost savings to the DoD, the Warfighter, and other Federal Agencies. DISA also provides decision-oriented information to the Secretary of Defense, Joint Staff, Military Services, Combatant Commands, and other mission partners. Key support areas include: Cyber Security and Cloud Computing: Cyber security and cloud computing present critical near-term challenges, especially the ability to securely leverage commercial cloud service offerings. DISA’s partnership with Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) will assess and transition relevant and mature solutions. Solutions included are applications that detect and mitigate cyberattacks, routing capabilities, embedded system defense capabilities, and resilient network capabilities. A major ongoing effort is Quantum Resistant Cryptography (QRC), which uses encryption algorithms to authenticate and secure data-in-transit and at rest that are susceptible to attacks from a computer. QRC is necessary to improve encryption on existing DoD systems, services and applications. DISA is working to measure the impacts of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) selected QRC algorithms on widely used applications and protocols. Technology Assessments: Through partnerships with industry, academia, and the Federal sectors, DISA produces requisite cyber measures and ensures optimal use of commercial cloud services. DISA will conduct technology assessments, process improvements, and analysis of potential technology to ensure consistency with DoDIN architecture and standards. Enabled by the Technology Assessment Framework (TAF) and the DISA Technology Information Repository (DTIR), DISA can perform “quick looks” and deeper evaluations of specific technologies to include: • Advanced cloud management capabilities • Physical containers (a stand-alone, executable unit of software) to enable mobile data • Emerging open-source and/or global standards for storage services • Analytic platform performance baselines of emerging commercial analytic platform products • Advanced approaches to Continuity of Operations (COOP) in a hybrid cloud environment • Next generation software defined networks for automating and virtualizing the DoDIN

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (4)

Modeling and Simulation - Capability Development, Test, and Evaluation

This effort is to update modeling and simulation tools to support evaluation of combined Internet Protocol (IP) and optical infrastructure, multiple software defined wide area network interconnectivity, and Next Generation Networking. The Next Generation Networking includes zero-trust architectures and encrypted Gray networks, which provide users access to the classified networks without having the full classified kit based on National Security Agency (NSA) capabilities.

Modeling and Simulation - Model Development for Entire Network Path

Develop scenario-based models to support new systems and applications.

End-to-End (E2E) Architecture

The E2E Architecture effort establishes Enterprise Architecture (EA) development standards, documents and generates needed IT architecture artifacts to provide E2E interoperability and performance analysis, and systems engineering support for architecture evolution across DISA. DISA works with its customers to ensure integrated capabilities can fulfill warfighter mission requirements and continuously revises these Enterprise Architectures to meet the needs of the department. Some of the ongoing EA activities and projects include the follow areas: - Develop EA development framework, EA taxonomy and associated templates to support agency-wide DoDAF-based architecture development and model-based systems engineering (MBSE) requirements in a standardized, effective way to meet the program and agency mission needs. - Help agency develop enterprise level architectures to support the agency’s mission critical and high priority projects. Examples of work include the development of the DISA Zero Trust Reference Design (ZTRD) architecture; DISA enterprise Privileged Access Management (PAM) solution architecture development and AoA analysis; DOD 5G architecture documentation, DISA RPA architecture; DISA DISN Out-of-band (OOB) Management Network architecture and AoA, and other emerging requirements from the agency senior leaders. - Develop capabilities and automated tools to support E2E architecture assessment and analysis in support of data-driven decisions. Examples of activities include developing automated cybersecurity assessments, architecture assessments for future architectures (e.g. SIPR 2.0), and DISA Common Enterprise Service (CES) analysis and recommendations study.

Department of Defense Information Network (DODIN) Systems Engineering and Support

The DoDIN System Engineering and Support project conducts critical research, test, and evaluation of operationally enabling IT capabilities. DISA identifies and evaluates leading government and industry technologies, products, and methodologies to address mission critical requirements across DISA and the DoD. Additionally, DISA conducts technology assessments and integrations to provide scalable and cost-effective solutions to meet the unique operational and security requirements of the department. DoDIN System Engineering and Support facilitates collaboration among industry and government partners through technical exchange sessions, proof of concepts, operational pilot initiatives, and limited production deployments to validate the potential operational and financial benefits of solutions and capabilities. Additionally, the DoDIN Systems Engineering and Support project includes the Chief Technology Officer’s Outlook and a Technology Watchlist. This Watchlist identifies key technology areas that are essential to DISA including Process/Automation, Cloud, Cyber Security, End-User Devices, and Communication (DoDIN, Mobile/End-User Devices).

Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideDISAFY24 Actuals$18.8M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideDISAFY25 Enacted$12.8M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideDISAFY25 Total$12.8M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideDISAFY26 Disc. Request$16.2M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideDISAFY26 Total$16.2M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget Figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$243.4M$18.8M$12.8M$16.2M$16.2M
E65: Modeling and Simulation and Enterprise Architecture$127.7M$8.06M$4.30M$4.33M$4.33M
T62: DoD Information Network (DODIN) Systems Engineering and Support$115.7M$10.7M$8.54M$11.8M$11.8M

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 1,741 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Awards

No awards are linked to this program element at high confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.

Lobbying Mentions

4 mentions from the Senate LDA disclosure database.

AECOMInfrastructure|Engineering2026matched 2+ title words

Issues related to U.S. Government international infrastructure development programs. Infrastructure projects in Latin…

AECOMInfrastructure|Engineering2025matched 2+ title words

FY 2026 Appropriations for Defense, Military Construction, Transportation HUD, Interior-EPA, Energy and Water…

AECOMInfrastructure|Engineering2025matched 2+ title words

Issues related to U.S. Government international infrastructure development programs. Infrastructure projects in Latin…

AECOMInfrastructure|Engineering2025matched 2+ title words

FY 2026 Appropriations for Defense, Military Construction, Transportation HUD, Interior-EPA, Energy and Water…

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Defense Info Infrastructure Engineering and Integration — no program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →