Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Seek Eagle

Air ForceRDT&EReconciledPE0207590F
What it is
Seek Eagle (0207590F) is an Air Force research & development line funded in the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force account. Its J-book detail breaks the line into 1 project.
What changed
-$1.28M FY25→26 R-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No company is linked to this line. Award records do not carry the program element, so the crosswalk is silent here — why.

Budget figures

FY24 Actuals
$33.4MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Total
$35.0MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$33.7MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
-$1.28MR-1 TOA · PB2026
Data coverage

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget trajectory

The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $33.4MFY25: $35.0MFY26: $33.7MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$33.4M
FY25$35.0M
FY26$33.7M

All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view

P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition

12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2015 actuals — PB2017 editionFY2016 actuals — PB2018 editionFY2017 actuals — PB2019 editionFY2018 actuals — PB2020 editionFY2019 actuals — PB2021 editionFY2020 actuals — PB2022 editionFY2021 actuals — PB2023 editionFY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2016 enacted — PB2017 editionFY2017 enacted — PB2018 editionFY2018 enacted — PB2019 editionFY2019 enacted — PB2020 editionFY2020 enacted — PB2021 editionFY2021 enacted — PB2022 editionFY2022 enacted — PB2023 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2017 request — PB2017 editionFY2018 request — PB2018 editionFY2019 request — PB2019 editionFY2020 request — PB2020 editionFY2021 request — PB2021 editionFY2022 request — PB2022 editionFY2023 request — PB2023 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY15FY18FY20FY22FY24FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$23.5M$21.1M$28.2M$25.3M$24.6M$28.2M$29.6M$30.5M$32.8M$33.4M
Enacted$21.6M$25.3M$25.4M$24.7M$28.2M$29.6M$30.5M$32.9M$33.5M$35.0M
Request$25.3M$25.4M$24.7M$28.2M$29.7M$30.5M$32.9M$33.5M$35.0M$33.7M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2017 book requested $25.3M for FY2017; the PB2019 book reported $28.2M as actual total obligation authority — $2.90M above the request. 28.2 − 25.3 = 2.9 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission — SEEK EAGLE Certifications

The Air Force SEEK EAGLE Office (AFSEO) is designated by the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force (Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics) as the center of expertise for aircraft-store compatibility activities and as the primary source of technical analysis and test support, as well as the central data repository, for the SEEK EAGLE process. The SEEK EAGLE process is a rigorous analysis of many factors to assure the safe and acceptable carriage and release (employment and jettison), safe escape, and ballistics accuracy of all stores on Air Force and foreign military sales aircraft. Thus, the AFSEO's mission as an accelerator is to ensure that every aircraft type is capable of employing the weapons and stores needed to meet Combatant Commander requirements, directly supporting the Secretary of the Air Force's (SECAF) Operational Imperatives (OI), and Cross-cutting Operational Enablers (COE). The Air Force operates a variety of combat and other aircraft that carry numerous and varied stores: bombs, missiles, rockets, fuel tanks, cargo pods, targeting pods, electronic countermeasures pods, etc. Stores are carried in many different loading combinations determined by operational and training scenarios, missions, tactics, and weapon development programs. Additionally, aircraft-store configuration (carriage and employment) requirements change as operational plans and tactics are updated and/or as new stores are developed and fielded. Aircraft program managers must provide SEEK EAGLE certifications for all aircraft-store configurations within their user-established carriage and employment parameters before they may be used for operations, test, or training. The AFSEO completes flight clearance and certification recommendations through any combination of engineering analysis, wind tunnel testing, modeling and simulation, and ground/flight test and evaluation. The SEEK EAGLE process encompasses eight engineering disciplines: Fit and Function, Flutter, Aircraft and Store Structural Integrity, Stability and Control, Electromagnetic Compatibility/Interference (EMC/EMI), Separations, Ballistics, and Safe Escape. In support of certification, the AFSEO recommends approximately 1000 aircraft-store combinations for flight each year through engineering analysis and testing. The AFSEO certification portfolio includes the Next Generation Air Dominance (NGAD) Family of Systems and B-21, as well as the following Mission Design Series aircraft: A-10, B-1, B-2, B-52, F-15C/D/E/EX, F-16, QF-16, F-22, F-35, KC-135, WC-130, MC-130H, HH-60W, MH-139A, MQ-9, T-7A, AT-6, and more. Integrated solutions for combat delivery mission planning problems are developed and provided to combat forces via Combat Weapons Delivery Software (CWDS) and Joint Safe Escape Analysis Solution (JSEAS) software. The SEEK EAGLE Office also works in coordination with the Air Force Safety Center to provide Hazards of Electromagnetic Radiation to Ordnance (HERO) analysis and certification recommendations for ordnance systems containing electro-explosive devices. Additionally, the AFSEO is responsible for incorporating new and emerging technologies into the SEEK EAGLE process to make certification more efficient in support of rapid acquisition timelines, as well as resourcing for the sustainment of a viable Air Force aircraft-store certification capability. SEEK EAGLE funds are budgeted to support certification testing and analysis for new and inventory stores including, but not limited to: Small Diameter Bomb (SDB) I and II, Laser Joint Direct Attack Munitions (LJDAM), Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile (JASSM), Long-Range Anti-Ship Missile (LRASM), Advanced Medium Range Air-to-Air Missile (AMRAAM), Miniature Air-Launched Decoy (MALD), BRU-57 (Smart Bomb Rack), BRU-61 (SDB Bomb Rack), Advanced Precision Kill Weapon System (APKWS), Sniper Targeting Pod with video data link, LITENING Targeting Pod with video data link, B61-12 nuclear free-fall weapon, penetrator warhead upgrades, practice bombs, electronic warfare pods, reconnaissance pods, and aircraft instrumentation pods. SEEK EAGLE funds also support certification of other inventory stores on Combat Air Forces (CAF) and Special Operations Command (SOCOM) aircraft. In addition, these funds further support capability development and weapons certification efforts required by Air Combat Command (ACC) to achieve Full Operational Capability (FOC) for the F-35A. Many of these weapons certification efforts are directly involved in SECAF OI-3, Moving Target Engagement, and all of them contribute to COE-1, Munitions. Additionally, many of the pods and other stores these funds support contribute directly to COE-2, Electromagnetic Spectrum. This program element may include necessary civilian pay expenses required to manage, execute, and deliver weapon system capability. The use of such programs funds would be in addition to the civilian pay expenses budgeted in program element 0605827F, 0605828F, 0605829F, 0605831F, 0605832F, 0605833F, 0605898F, 0606398F. In FY24, 9.893M was obligated for civilian pay expenses in this program element, and 10.880M was forecasted for civilian pay expenses in FY25 in this program element. The FY26 request has been reduced by .034M for Advisory and Assistance Services to promote efficiencies and advance the policies of the Administration in alignment with Executive Order 14222, "Implementing the President's Department of Government Efficiency Cost Efficiency Initiative." This program is in Budget Activity 7, Operational System Development because this budget activity includes development efforts to upgrade systems that have been fielded or have received approval for full rate production and anticipate production funding in the current or subsequent fiscal year.

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (4)

Aircraft-Store Certification

Evaluates aircraft-store compatibility through analysis of ground and flight test data. Supports procurement of test assets, such as instrumented weapons, and includes end-to-end tracking of MAJCOM requirements from user request to tech data fielding and operational flight program (OFP) updates. Provides certification recommendations to airworthiness authorities.

Operations Baseline and Mission Support

Supports the ability to rapidly meet emerging warfighter needs for global operations and other ongoing world-wide operations through sustainment of a viable Air Force aircraft-store certification capability.

Advanced Capability Development

Provides resources to increase the Air Force SEEK EAGLE OFFICE (AFSEO) organic capabilities, to support advanced weapons such as hypersonic weapons and other classified weapons programs, as well as investing in the development of advanced modeling and analytical tools to make the SEEK EAGLE certification process more efficient in support of rapid acquisition timelines. These resources include, but are not limited to: artificial intelligence, modeling and simulation enhancements, wind tunnel model development, automated tool enhancements, information technology enhancements, and facility improvements.

Tools, Equipment, and Capability Sustainment

Supports development and sustainment of state-of-the-art engineering and business tools to support the SEEK EAGLE enterprise. Funding resources are required for operational management of existing information and technology infrastructure, hardware, software, and equipment.

Budget line items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY24 Actuals$33.4M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY25 Enacted$35.0M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY25 Total$35.0M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY26 Disc. Request$33.7M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY26 Total$33.7M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$0$33.4M$35.0M$33.7M$33.7M
674037: SEEK EAGLE Certifications$0$33.4M$35.0M$33.7M$33.7M

Follow the dollar

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 312 of 1,938 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Awards

No awards are linked to this program element at high or medium confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.

Lobbying mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Seek Eagle. No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

Program dossier

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →

Primary sources

Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.

Budget totals · TOA sources

Detailed budget justification

The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.