Printed from https://fiscalreceipts.com/program/0207327F/ — built September 26, 2026. Every figure is citation-backed; see the page online for per-number provenance.
Small Diameter Bomb (SDB)
Budget figures
FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →
Budget trajectory
| Fiscal year | Amount |
|---|---|
| FY24 | $42.9M |
| FY25 | $29.9M |
| FY26 | $24.8M |
All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026
Decade view
P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.
● actuals (line) · ○ enacted · ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.
| Series | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actuals | $0 | $20.0M | $31.0M | $38.0M | $42.9M | ||
| Enacted | – | $20.8M | $32.1M | $32.7M | $37.5M | $29.9M | |
| Request | – | – | $27.1M | $27.7M | $37.5M | $29.9M | $24.8M |
blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.
Asked vs spent: the PB2023 book requested $27.7M for FY2023; the PB2025 book reported $38.0M as actual total obligation authority — $10.3M above the request. 38.0 − 27.7 = 10.3 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.
Program lineage
No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.
Description
Mission — SDB Increment II
GBU-53/B Small Diameter Bomb Increment II (SDB II) StormBreaker is a joint interest United States Air Force (USAF) and Department of Navy (DoN) Acquisition Category (ACAT) IC program, with the USAF as the lead service. SDB II addresses the following warfighter requirements: attack moving and stationary targets; adverse weather operations; multiple ordnance carriage; precision munitions capability; reduced munitions footprint; increased weapons effectiveness; minimized potential for collateral damage; reduced susceptibility of munitions to countermeasures; and provides a network-enabled weapon capability via Link-16 and Ultra High Frequency (UHF) weapon data link. SDB II is a key component of the Air Force Global Strike Task Force Concept of Operations (CONOPs). The threshold aircraft for the USAF is the F-15E, and the threshold aircraft for the DoN are the F-35B and F-35C. Objective aircraft include the F-22, F-16, F-35A, B-2, A-10, MQ-9, B-1, B-52, AC-130 and the F/A-18E/F. SDB II is compatible with the Bomb Rack Unit-61 (BRU-61) miniature munitions carriage, Type II carriage systems, the Container Numerical Unit-660/E (CNU-660/E) carriage system, the Common Munitions Built In Test (BIT)/Reprogramming Equipment (CMBRE), and the Joint Mission Planning System (JMPS). SDB II will develop and field a single weapon storage container (USAF) and a dual weapon storage container (DoN). SDB II completed a competitive Risk Reduction in October 2009 and entered Milestone B Engineering and Manufacturing Development (EMD) in August 2010. A Fixed Price Incentive Firm EMD contract with five options for annual Low Rate Initial Production (LRIP) lots (FY15-FY19) was awarded in August 2010. SDB II received Milestone C approval to enter LRIP in June 2015 and completed an Acquisition Program Baseline (APB) update. Contract options for LRIP Lots 1-5 have been exercised. Initial Operational Test and Evaluation (IOT&E) started June 2018 and completed December 2019. SDB II was fielded for the F-15E in September 2020. DoN's first production lot (Lot 4/FY19) supports F/A-18E/F Initial Operating Capability (IOC). The Milestone Decision Authority approved an APB update May 2022 to incorporate the new Air Force inventory objective and adjust for new F-35B/C software schedules. Implements tenets of Open, Agile, and Digital acquisition for any new subsystem hardware or software development. Integrates the system in weapon portfolio trade space studies by conducting trade studies, system engineering, test activities, and system modeling and simulation. Builds and refines a mission modeling framework by incorporating higher-fidelity weapon system designs and updates to the threat landscape to conduct ongoing assessment of weapon system performance against the authoritative threat. Leverages common component development, in collaboration with other weapon systems, to reduce redundant costs between systems with similar subsystems requirements. Invests in analytical, information management, data management, digital environments, networks, facilities, and security infrastructure upgrades directly supporting development and sustainment of this program's capabilities, while leveraging Department of Defense (DoD) and Department of Air Force (DAF) enterprise Information Technology (IT) solutions. This effort includes design, development, test, integration, and implementation of appropriate modular open systems approach, related components, and efforts, such as, but not limited to electrical, logical, and physical interfaces defined in relevant Open System Architecture (OSA) standards. This approach allows modular and severable subsystems, to include those that are software-defined, at the appropriate level to be incrementally added, removed, or replaced throughout the life cycle. This program element may include necessary civilian pay expenses required to manage, execute, and deliver weapon system capability. The use of such program funds would be in addition to the civilian pay expenses budgeted in program element 0605829F, 0605831F, 0605833F, or 0605898F. In FY 2024 $0.718M was expended for civilian pay expenses in this program element, and in FY 2025 $0.752M is forecast for civilian pay expenses in this program element. This requirement supports performance of a full financial audit as required by title 10 U.S.C. Chapter 9A, Sec 240-D The FY 2026 request was reduced by $0.025 million for Advisory and Assistance Services to promote efficiencies and advance the policies of the Administration in alignment with Executive Order 14222, "Implementing the President's Department of Government Efficiency Cost Efficiency Initiative.” This program is in Budget Activity 7, Operational System Development because this budget activity includes development efforts to upgrade systems that have been fielded or have received approval for full rate production and anticipate production funding in the current or subsequent fiscal year.
Justification
Accomplishments & Planned Programs (2)
SDB II Development and Engineering Changes
Development activities to deliver capabilities in the SDB II Capability Development Document (CDD). Design, develop, integrate, model, test, and qualify engineering changes to SDB II baseline hardware and software to meet emerging threat, new technologies and to maintain compatibility with external systems. Activities include, but are not limited to, DoD-mandated data link cryptographic modernization, program protection, exportability features, cyber security, advanced guidance, navigation and control, enhanced lethality, precise/advance navigation, and software capability upgrades. Conduct trade studies and concept development for technology refresh redesigns as based on obsolescence forecasts.
SDB II M-Code
M-Code provides an enhanced anti-jam capability and secures access to military GPS signals. Activities include, but are not limited to design, development, test and qualification of engineering changes to the SDB II system required for M-Code and enhanced anti-jam capability. M-Code will provide the ability to operate in increasing adversarial Anti-Access/Area-Denial (A2/AD) jamming environments with increased accuracy, better signal acquisition, and enhanced security features.
Budget line items(workbook-cited)
P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.
Exhibit R-1
| Account | Org | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force | F | FY24 Actuals | $42.9M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force | F | FY25 Enacted | $29.9M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force | F | FY25 Total | $29.9M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force | F | FY26 Disc. Request | $24.8M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force | F | FY26 Total | $24.8M |
Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)
J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.
Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.
| Project | All Prior Years | FY24 Actuals | FY25 Total | FY26 Base | FY26 Request |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program Element | $0 | $42.9M | $29.9M | $24.8M | $24.8M |
| 675191: SDB Increment II | $0 | $42.9M | $29.9M | $24.8M | $24.8M |
Follow the dollar
No follow-the-dollar view — none of this program's high-confidence awards records a positive obligation at any place of performance (flows cover 312 of 1,938 programs). why coverage is partial? →
Related awards
Award linkage is shown for 32 of 200 profiled companies — high- and medium-confidence USAspending matches, each row labeled; medium is the weaker evidence. why partial award coverage? →
| Recipient | PIID | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| RAYTHEON COMPANY | FA867219D0001 | high |
Contractor concentration
No concentration index is published for this line. This line's high-confidence links do not clear the floor for a published concentration index — at least 3 awards across 2 contractor families holding positive obligations, with positive net linked dollars. An index below that floor is a fact about the sample, not about the market. Whatever further links this line carries are medium-confidence, and what each medium evidence path does and does not establish is set out in the methodology. Both bases are in the downloadable warehouse.
Lobbying mentions
No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.
Oversight
Department-level designation (not specific to this program)
GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Small Diameter Bomb (SDB). No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.
Program dossier
No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →
Primary sources
Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.
Budget totals · TOA sources
FY2026 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J692
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2026_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2022 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J688
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2022_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2023 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J660
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2023_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2024 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J652
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2024_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2025 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J672
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2025_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
Detailed budget justification
The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.
FY2026 Air Force Research and Development Test and Evaluation, Vol. I · www.saffm.hq.af.mil
PDF page 21