Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Autonomous Collaborative Platforms

Air ForceRDT&EReconciledPE0207179F
What it is
Autonomous Collaborative Platforms (0207179F) is an Air Force research & development line funded in the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force account. Its J-book detail breaks the line into 2 projects.
What changed
+$11.4M FY25→26 R-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No company is linked to this line. Award records do not carry the program element, so the crosswalk is silent here — why.

Budget figures

FY24 Actuals
$110.9MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Total
$50.7MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$62.0MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
+$11.4MR-1 TOA · PB2026
Data coverage

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget trajectory

The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends lower than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends lower than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $110.9MFY25: $50.7MFY26: $62.0MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$110.9M
FY25$50.7M
FY26$62.0M

All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view

P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition

6 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2021–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
6 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2021–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2021 actuals — PB2023 editionFY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2022 enacted — PB2023 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2023 request — PB2023 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$0$0$55.0M$110.9M
Enacted–$0$51.7M$118.8M$50.7M
Request––$51.7M$118.8M$51.7M$62.0M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2024 book requested $118.8M for FY2024; the PB2026 book reported $110.9M as actual total obligation authority — $7.88M below the request. 110.9 − 118.8 = -7.9 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission — Autonomous Collaborative Platforms

Autonomous Collaborative Platforms (ACP) are uncrewed weapon systems designed to work in conjunction with current and future aircraft to provide operational flexibility and enhance operational effectiveness. Key ACP attributes include tailored cost of platforms, rapidly updateable software, autonomy, interoperability with multiple platforms and network capabilities, agility of use, lethality, and ability to penetrate challenging air environments. The program matures technology to reduce risk through development, integration, experimentation, and test activities. Autonomous Collaborative Technologies (ACT) served as the starting point for the Air Force's investment in the Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCA) program. ACP will explore Doctrine, Organization, Training, Materiel, Leadership, Personnel, Facilities, and Policy (DOTMLPF-P) concepts for uncrewed vehicles. Program activities include digital engineering, agile software development, open systems architectures, and risk reduction projects. Funding provides digital systems infrastructure, operational concept exploration, technology studies, multi-domain integration assessments, operational and system architecture development, flight test and test support, prototypes, training and demonstration, program management support, as well as maturation and risk reduction of air superiority related technologies to include weapons systems, autonomy, and integrated system concept development. Program management support costs include but are not limited to contractor support services, civilian pay, supplies, and facility related expenses. This program element may include necessary civilian pay expenses required to manage, execute, and deliver weapon system capability. The use of such program funds would be in addition to the civilian pay expenses budgeted in program element 0605829F, 0605831F, 0605833F, or 0605898F. This effort is in Budget Activity 4, Advanced Component Development and Prototypes (ACD&P), because efforts are necessary to evaluate integrated technologies, representative modes or prototype systems in a high fidelity and realistic operating environment.

Mission — Experimental Operations Unit (EOU)

The Experimental Operations Unit (EOU) effort explores Doctrine, Organization, Training, Materiel, Leadership, Personnel, Facilities, and Policy (DOTMLPF-P) concepts for Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCA). Program activities serve as early risk reduction for employment of CCA with crewed aircraft to mature operational concept development and evaluate supporting force structure to execute CCA operations. Funding provides operational concepts and studies, flight test and test support, prototypes, infrastructure investment for information technology, training and demonstration, and program management support to mature autonomous operational concepts. Program management support costs include but are not limited to contractor support services, supplies, and facility related expenses. This program element may include necessary civilian pay expenses required to manage, execute, and deliver weapon system capability. The use of such program funds would be in addition to the civilian pay expenses budgeted in program element 0605829F, 0605831F, 0605833F, or 0605898F.

Mission — Viper Experimentation and Next-gen Operations Model (VENOM)

The Viper Experimentation and Next-gen Operations Model (VENOM) effort serves as a flying autonomy testbed for Autonomous Collaborative Platforms (ACP). Program activities reduce risk to ACP through test and demonstration of the autonomy reference architecture and autonomy software on a F-16, or other human-on-the-loop testbed. Funding provides flight test and test support (including modifications), infrastructure investments for information technology, training, and program management support to mature autonomy architecture and software. Program management support costs include but are not limited to contractor support services, supplies, and facility related expenses. This program element may include necessary civilian pay expenses required to manage, execute, and deliver weapon system capability. The use of such program funds would be in addition to the civilian pay expenses budgeted in program element 0605829F, 0605831F, 0605833F, or 0605898F.

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (2)

Experimental Operations Unit

The EOU candidate concepts consist of operational analyses, prototypes, studies and identification of operation concepts. Ongoing studies and operational analysis are conducted to refine EOU concepts related to test and employment of uncrewed platforms as well as employment with crewed platforms.

Viper Experimentation and Next-gen Operations Model

The VENOM candidate concepts consist of establishing human-on-the-loop autonomy testbeds, enabling modifications and implementing initial autonomy reference architecture to reduce risk for ACP autonomy.

Budget line items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY24 Actuals$110.9M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY25 Enacted$50.7M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY25 Total$50.7M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY26 Disc. Request$62.0M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY26 Total$62.0M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$0$110.9M$50.7M$62.0M$62.0M
643721: Experimental Operations Unit (EOU)$0$80.1M$44.5M$55.4M$55.4M
645340: Viper Experimentation and Next-gen Operations Model (VENOM)$0$30.9M$6.13M$6.57M$6.57M

Follow the dollar

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 312 of 1,938 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Awards

No awards are linked to this program element at high or medium confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.

Lobbying mentions

7 mentions from the Senate LDA disclosure database.

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONALAutonomous|Collaborative2026matched 2+ title words

Issues related to FAA, FHA, automotive technology programs, aviation safety and runway safety Issues related to…

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONALAutonomous|Collaborative2025matched 2+ title words

Issues related to FAA, FHA, and automotive technology programs Issues related to Corporate Average Fuel Economy and…

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONALAutonomous|Collaborative2025matched 2+ title words

Issues related to FAA, FHA, and automotive technology programs Issues related to autonomous vehicles and advanced air…

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONALAutonomous|Collaborative2025matched 2+ title words

Issues related to FAA, FHA, and automotive technology programs Issues related to Corporate Average Fuel Economy and…

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONALAutonomous|Collaborative2025matched 2+ title words

Issues related to FAA, FHA, and automotive technology programs Issues related to Corporate Average Fuel Economy and…

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONALAutonomous|Collaborative2024matched 2+ title words

Issues related to FAA, FHA, and automotive technology programs Issues related to Corporate Average Fuel Economy and…

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONALAutonomous|Collaborative2024matched 2+ title words

Issues related to FAA, FHA, and automotive technology programs Issues related to Corporate Average Fuel Economy and…

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Autonomous Collaborative Platforms. No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

Program dossier

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →

Primary sources

Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.

Budget totals · TOA sources

Detailed budget justification

The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.