Printed from https://fiscalreceipts.com/program/0205633N/ — built September 26, 2026. Every figure is citation-backed; see the page online for per-number provenance.
Aviation Improvements
Budget figures
FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →
Budget trajectory
| Fiscal year | Amount |
|---|---|
| FY24 | $138.5M |
| FY25 | $136.3M |
| FY26 | $127.4M |
All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026
Decade view
P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.
● actuals (line) · ○ enacted · ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.
| Series | FY15 | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actuals | $83.1M | $103.7M | $121.1M | $120.9M | $131.0M | $118.0M | $122.9M | $140.5M | $149.7M | $138.5M | ||
| Enacted | $106.3M | $120.9M | $119.1M | $134.8M | $125.5M | $126.4M | $144.6M | $149.4M | $143.3M | $136.3M | ||
| Request | $120.9M | $119.1M | $121.8M | $125.5M | $134.0M | $132.5M | $130.4M | $143.3M | $136.3M | $127.4M |
blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.
Asked vs spent: the PB2023 book requested $130.4M for FY2023; the PB2025 book reported $149.7M as actual total obligation authority — $19.2M above the request. 149.67 − 130.45 = 19.22 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.
Program lineage
No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.
Description
Mission — Aviation Improvements
Project 0601 - Common Ground Equipment is a Naval Aviation Project to apply new technology to common support equipment due to obsolescence necessary to support multiple systems/aircraft within the Navy. Project 0852: Consolidated Automated Support System (CASS) Family of Testers (FoT) are standardized Automated Test Equipment (ATE) with computer assisted, multi-function capabilities to support the maintenance of aircraft weapons systems and missiles. Organizational Level (O-Level) testers are other types of standardized ATE with computer assisted, multi-function capabilities to support the maintenance of aircraft weapons systems. ATE host, and their Test Program Sets (TPS), along with associated ancillary are considered Automatic Test Systems (ATS). Project 1041 - Aircraft Equipment Reliability/Maintainability Improvement Program is the only Navy program that provides engineering support for in-service out-of-production aircraft equipment and provides increased readiness at reduced operational and support cost. Project 1355 - Aircraft Engine Component Improvement Program develops reliability and maintainability and safety enhancements for in-service Navy aircraft engines, transmissions, propellers, starters, auxiliary power units, electrical generating systems, fuel systems, fuels, and lubricants. Project 1356 - Corrosion Prevention Improvements funding will enable the NAE to establish a Center of Excellence for Corrosion and Finish (CoECF) Training focused on educating, training, and certifying qualified, proficient maintainers capable of performing: corrosion identification, corrosion inspection, corrosion prevention, corrosion repair and restoration. Qualified, proficient maintainers will improve material readiness through improved material condition, while also developing the knowledge & maintenance skills of Sailors and Marines. JUSTIFICATION FOR BUDGET ACTIVITY: This program is funded under OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT because it includes development efforts to upgrade systems that have been fielded or have received approval for full rate production and anticipate funding in the current or subsequent fiscal year.
Mission — IFDIS fault detection
Target efforts aimed at reducing intermittent faults in Electrical Wiring Interconnect System (EWIS) on aircraft to improve readiness and reduce related non-value-added maintenance costs. Conduct trade studies to determine the significance of intermittence, assess the effectivity of existing fielded test aircraft wiring test equipment to combat EWIS intermittence and to perform gap analyses between the causes of intermittence and the capabilities of equipment for detecting these issues.
Mission — Acft Handling & Service Equip
Common Ground Equipment is a Naval Aviation Project to apply new technology to common support equipment due to obsolescence necessary to support multiple systems/aircraft within the Navy. The common support equipment items developed with this budget are briefed to the Air Force, Army and Coast Guard for possible use in joint procurement in the production phase. Recent transition has merged existing Portable Electronic Maintenance Aids (PEMA) and Standard PEMA Cyber Solution (SPEC) project lines under Aviation Maintenance Advancement Solutions (AMAS). Funding supports the evaluation, testing and integration to develop PEMA Commercial solution for portable device deployments across the Naval Aviation Enterprise. PEMA is a portable device utilized by maintainers with the implementation of digital maintenance capabilities (digital publications, Interactive Electronic Technical Manuals, Internet Protocol based data uploads, Binary digit data downloads, automated diagnostics, and planeside Naval Aviation Logistics Command/Management Information System. PEMAs are mandatory display devices supporting modern day Automated Maintenance Environment implemented for weapon systems. Future Readiness Initiative to Develop SPECS architecture for all PEMAs to standardize software across NAE, leverage existing enterprise tools, and to correct cyber shortfalls identified by the Cyber Warfare Detachment (CWD). A Cyber Risk Assessment (CRA) identified vulnerabilities on the PEMA system that could be exploited to threaten U.S. capabilities. A new software image and configuration management process has been identified to mitigate the top 60% of identified risk groups and 100% of penetration test findings from the CRA. Engine Test Instrumentation Replacement System (ETIRS) provides post maintenance Navy and Marine Corps Intermediate (I) - Level out-of-airframe test capability, for various aircraft engines. It will be used at shipboard and land-based engine test activities to support testing of turbofan, turboshaft and turboprop engines. ETIRS will include development of unique Engine Test Program Sets (TPSs). The Legacy ETI systems are reaching end of life and exhibiting significant obsolescence issues impacting sustainment.
Mission — Consolidated Auto Support System
The electronic Consolidated Automated Support System (eCASS) project is the system design and development of the latest generation of the US Navy's CASS family of automatic test systems and is the replacement system for legacy CASS systems, which provides Naval aircraft avionics component maintenance and repair support at Intermediate and Depot maintenance facilities both shore-based and afloat. As a CASS replacement program, the eCASS program objectives remain the same as that of CASS. Specifically: (1) increase material readiness; (2) reduce life cycle costs; (3) improve tester sustainability at depot and intermediate maintenance levels; (4) reduce proliferation of unique test equipment, and (5) provide test capability for existing and emerging avionics/electronics aircraft weapon systems. The Test Technology development project includes analysis, application, maturation, integration and testing of emerging electronic, mechanical, and optical test technologies for potential military utility for emerging requirements or obsolescence resolution in support of Naval avionics testing and repair. Specifically included are next-generation, electro-optics, synthetic instruments, high-speed bus technologies, inertial device technologies, and various other elements of modernization for legacy Electronic Warfare (EW) and Communication, Navigation and Identification (CNI) test systems, as well as the Consolidated Automated Support System (CASS) family of testers and other Automatic Test Systems (ATS) Support Equipment (SE) which supports the testing and repair of any Naval aviation equipment, including associated Test Program Sets (TPSs), and ancillary equipment. Automatic Test Systems (ATS) Modernization project includes efforts to address modernization and required obsolescence analysis and updates for legacy Electronic Warfare (EW) and Communication, Navigation and Identification (CNI) test systems, as well as the Consolidated Automated Support System (CASS) family of testers as ATS. The ATS encompasses both software and hardware updates. Modernization required to support emerging T/M/S technologies such as next-generation electro-optics, synthetic instruments, high-speed bus technologies, inertial device technologies needed for ATS support. Efforts cover the Electronic Warfare (EW) Testers, eCASS, their ancillary and any required Test Program Sets (TPSs) and ancillary equipment. The Fourth Generation Electro-Optical (EO4) development project consists of the design and development of the latest generation electro-optic test console for use with the electronic CASS (eCASS) automatic test system. The EO4 system will replace the legacy Third Generation Electro-Optical (EO3) system, which is facing imminent obsolescence, in providing test, repair, and maintenance capability for Naval and Marine Corps electro-optic weapon systems at both shore-based and afloat sites. As an EO3 replacement program, the EO4 program objectives remain the same as EO3. Specifically: (1) provide test capability for existing and emerging electro-optic weapon systems and components; (2) reduce life-cycle costs; (3) improve sustainability at intermediate and depot levels of maintenance; and (4) reduce proliferation of unique test equipment. The Avionics CASS Test Programs Sets project consists of analysis, design, development and testing of common interface hardware and software technologies used to connect avionics test articles to common ATE SE for emerging and common application of directing test functions. This includes software for fault detection and isolation, diagnosis, and condition certification of the unit under test as well as hardware consisting of interface devices, cables, probes, and holding fixtures. The Organizational Level Testers project consists of the design, development, and testing of a common single replacement O-Level test capability used for flight line Electronic Warfare, Communication, Navigation, and Identification testing and is the replacement for the Joint Service Electronic Combat Systems Tester (JSECST) and the Signal Generator Test Set currently at the of their life and exhibiting sustainment, obsolescence, and accuracy repeatability challenges. The Organizational Level Testers project consists of the design, development, and testing of a common single replacement O-Level test capability used for flight line Electronic Warfare, Communication, Navigation, and Identification testing and is the replacement for the Joint Service Electronic Combat Systems Tester (JSECST) and the Signal Generator Test Set currently at the of their life and exhibiting sustainment, obsolescence, and accuracy repeatability challenges.
Mission — Aircraft Equipment Reliability/Maintainability Improvement Program (AERMIP)
Aircraft Equipment Reliability/Maintainability Improvement Program (AERMIP) is the only Navy program which provides Research, Development, Test & Evaluation engineering support specifically for in-service, out-of-production aircraft equipment. AERMIP increases readiness through reliability, maintainability, and safety improvements to existing systems and equipment installed in Naval aircraft. It also provides a transition vehicle to deploy Total Ownership Cost reduction initiatives through flight-test support and Fleet Test & Evaluation. It meets affordable readiness objectives by providing a cost-effective solution to obsolescence problems encountered when service lives are extended. AERMIP promotes commonality and standardization across aircraft platform lines and among the services through extension of application and use of non-developmental items. AERMIP also decreases life cycle costs through reduced operational and support costs. AERMIP facilitates the Operational, Safety and Improvement Program by applying proven low-risk solutions to current fleet problems. AERMIP also funds high-priority flight testing which is not associated with any acquisition or development program under the Flight Test General task.
Mission — Propulsion and Power Component Improvement Program
The Propulsion and Power (P&P) Component Improvement Program (CIP) provides the only source of critical design and development engineering support to resolve safety, reliability and maintainability deficiencies of in-service Navy and Marine Corps aircraft propulsion systems. The highest priority issues P&P CIP addresses concern safety-of-flight deficiencies, which account for approximately 80% of P&P CIP efforts. The program also corrects service-revealed deficiencies, improves Operational Readiness and Reliability and Maintainability, and reduces platform Life Cycle Cost. Budgets are allocated across platform-specific teams and multi-platform product support teams based upon long term strategies to achieve safety and affordable readiness goals; the R-3 exhibit details annual portions of those long-term strategies. P&P CIP tasks have reduced the rate of in-flight aborts, safety incidents, non-mission capable rates, scheduled and unscheduled engine removals, maintenance work hours, and overall cost of ownership. This is accomplished through the maintenance and validation of specification performance, testing to qualify engineering changes, verifying life limits, and improving the inherent reliability of the propulsion and power systems as an integral part of Reliability Centered Maintenance initiatives. Historically, the missions, tactics, and environmental exposure of military aircraft systems change to meet new threats or operational demands, and often result in unforeseen problems, which if not corrected, can cause critical safety/readiness degradation, such as those experienced during OPERATIONS DESERT SHIELD/DESERT STORM, ENDURING FREEDOM, and IRAQI FREEDOM due to sand erosion. In addition, new problems arise through actual fleet deployment and usage of the aircraft. System development programs, while geared to resolve as many problems as possible before deployment, cannot duplicate actual operations or account for the vast array of environmental and usage variables, particularly when aircraft missions vary from those that the aircraft was designed to perform. Therefore, it has been found that P&P CIP can provide an immediate engineering response to these flight-critical problems and accelerated engine testing can avoid potential problems. P&P CIP starts after development and Navy acceptance of the first production article and addresses usage and life problems not covered by warranties. P&P CIP addresses engines, transmissions, propellers, starters, auxiliary power units, electrical generating systems, aircraft wiring, and fuel and lubricant systems. These efforts continue over the system's life, gradually decreasing to a minimum level sufficient to maintain the reliability, and decrease the operating costs, of older inventory. P&P CIP is a highly leveraged and cooperative tri-service program with Foreign Military Sales participation.
Mission — Corrosion Prevention Improvements
Corrosion Prevention Improvements support efforts to improve existing and new weapon systems resilience to corrosion degradation, increasing operational availability. This funding will enable the NAE to: 1. Establish a Center of Excellence for Corrosion and Finish (CoECF) Training focused on educating, training, and certifying qualified, proficient maintainers capable of performing corrosion prevention and control inspection and maintenance. 2. Validate and demonstrate solid state structural (S3R) repair techniques to extend the service life of components damaged by corrosion, wear or other occurrences. 3. Validate and demonstrate novel cold spray powders to improve the corrosion prevention and durability of cold spray repairs. 4. Demonstrate the value of laser ablation capability to remove corrosion and coatings on aviation components.
Justification
Accomplishments & Planned Programs (7)
Engine Test Instrumentation Replacement System (ETIRS)
Due to obsolescence, sustainment and calibration challenges, replace legacy ETI systems with new universal ETI system. Consider a single design solution that can operate all three engine variants. Obtain data rights to facilitate economical sustainment decisions. Provide a design for optimum maintainability and supportability. Establish a sustainment structure that will address future obsolescence. Establish In-house Navy Calibration capabilities. Establish intermediate maintenance level repair procedures both ashore and afloat.
Aviation Maintenance Advancement Solutions (AMAS)
Aviation Maintenance Advancement Solutions (AMAS) has formed by the merge of The Portable Electronic Maintenance Aid (PEMA)and Standard PEMA Cyber Solution (SPECS). Portable Electronic Maintenance Aid (PEMA) funding supports the evaluation, testing and integration to develop PEMA Commercial Off-the-Shelf (COTS) solution for portable device deployments across the Naval Aviation Enterprise. PEMAs are portable devices utilized by maintainers with the implementation of digital maintenance capabilities (digital publications, Interactive Electronic Technical Manuals, Internet Protocol based data uploads, Binary digit data downloads, automated diagnostics, and planeside Naval Aviation Logistic Command Management Information System. PEMAs are a mandatory display device supporting modern day Automated Maintenance Environment implemented for weapon systems. Cyber Risk Assessment (CRA) has identified cyber vulnerabilities that could be exploited to threaten US fighting forces. Implementation of mandatory Cyber Security (CS) requirements would decrease the CS attack surface. Develop Standard PEMA Cyber Solution (SPECS) architecture for all PEMAs to standardize software across NAE, leverage existing enterprise tools, and to correct cyber shortfalls identified by the Cyber Warfare Detachment (CWD) Cyber Risk Assessment (CRA). Implement CS enhancements to reduce risk from cyber-attack.
Test Technology Development
Develops, integrates, and evolves enhanced test capabilities and technologies for insertion into legacy Electronic Warfare (EW) and Communication, Navigation and Identification (CNI) test systems, as well as the Consolidated Automated Support System (CASS) family of test systems and other Automatic Test Systems (ATS) Support Equipment (SE). As aviation and weapon system evolve, new test capabilities and cyber techniques are required to support advanced systems. Existing test capabilities must be extended in range, accuracy, time and frequency domains in order to sustain the required test accuracy ratios for weapon systems support (the Automatic Test System must be at least four times as accurate as the asset being tested).
ATS Modernization/Product Improvement
ATS Modernization project includes efforts to address modernization and required obsolescence analysis and updates for legacy Electronic Warfare (EW) and Communication, Navigation and Identification (CNI) test systems, as well as the Consolidated Automated Support System (CASS) family of testers and other Automatic Test Systems (ATS) Support Equipment (SE). The ATS encompasses both software and hardware updates. Modernization required to support emerging T/M/S technologies such as next-generation electro-optics, synthetic instruments, high-speed bus technologies, inertial device technologies needed for ATS support. Efforts cover the Electronic Warfare (EW) Testers, eCASS, and their ancillary and any required Test Program Sets (TPSs) and ancillary equipment.
Avionics Test Program Sets
The Avionics CASS Test Programs Sets project consists of analysis, design, development and testing of common interface hardware and software technologies used to connect avionics test articles to common ATE SE for emerging and common application of directing test functions. This includes software for fault detection and isolation, diagnosis, and condition certification of the unit under test as well as hardware consisting of interface devices, cables, probes, and holding fixtures.This is a non-ACAT program. Procurement strategy is determined by market survey and cooperative opportunities.
EO4 Development
Design, develop, integrate, and test a Fourth Generation Electro-Optics (EO4) test system to replace the legacy EO3 test system. EO4 systems will provide the capability to test and diagnose an array of electro-optic weapons systems on F/A-18, H-60, JSF, and other aircraft platforms to support visual imaging, target identification and tracking, range finding, night-vision, and other electro-optic weapon system capabilities.
Organizational Level Testers
The Organizational Level Testers project consists of the design, development, and testing of a common single replacement O-Level test capability used for flight line Electronic Warfare, Communication, Navigation, and Identification testing and is the replacement for the Joint Service Electronic Combat Systems Tester (JSECST) and the Signal Generator Test Set currently at the of their life and exhibiting sustainment, obsolescence, and accuracy repeatability challenges
Budget line items(workbook-cited)
P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.
Exhibit R-1
| Account | Org | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY24 Actuals | $138.5M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY25 Enacted | $136.3M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY25 Total | $136.3M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY26 Disc. Request | $127.4M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY26 Total | $127.4M |
Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)
J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.
Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.
| Project | All Prior Years | FY24 Actuals | FY25 Total | FY26 Base | FY26 Request |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program Element | $2.12B | $138.5M | $136.3M | $127.4M | $127.4M |
| 0357: IFDIS fault detection | $0 | $1.99M | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| 0601: Acft Handling & Service Equip | $58.1M | $7.21M | $9.19M | $7.55M | $7.55M |
| 0852: Consolidated Auto Support System | $228.6M | $7.31M | $8.90M | $8.15M | $8.15M |
| 1041: Aircraft Equipment Reliability/Maintainability Improvement Program (AERMIP) | $80.9M | $5.45M | $4.96M | $4.73M | $4.73M |
| 1355: Propulsion and Power Component Improvement Program | $1.75B | $112.7M | $107.8M | $104.8M | $104.8M |
| 1356: Corrosion Prevention Improvements | $0 | $3.82M | $5.47M | $2.16M | $2.16M |
Follow the dollar
No follow-the-dollar view — none of this program's high-confidence awards records a positive obligation at any place of performance (flows cover 312 of 1,938 programs). why coverage is partial? →
Related awards
Award linkage is shown for 32 of 200 profiled companies — high- and medium-confidence USAspending matches, each row labeled; medium is the weaker evidence. why partial award coverage? →
| Recipient | PIID | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION | N6833520D0935 | high |
Contractor concentration
No concentration index is published for this line. This line's high-confidence links do not clear the floor for a published concentration index — at least 3 awards across 2 contractor families holding positive obligations, with positive net linked dollars. An index below that floor is a fact about the sample, not about the market. Whatever further links this line carries are medium-confidence, and what each medium evidence path does and does not establish is set out in the methodology. Both bases are in the downloadable warehouse.
Lobbying mentions
20 mentions from the Senate LDA disclosure database.
Funding, programs and projects pertaining to transportation and infrastructure investment, including funding for…
Funding, programs and projects pertaining to transportation and infrastructure investment, including funding for…
Issues related to aviation safety improvements.
Issues related to aviation safety improvements.
Support funding for air traffic improvements, human space flight technology, aviation propulsion technologies…
Support funding for air traffic improvements, human space flight technology, aviation propulsion technologies…
Funding, programs and projects pertaining to transportation and infrastructure investment, including funding for…
Funding, programs and projects pertaining to transportation and infrastructure investment, including funding for…
Funding, programs and projects pertaining to transportation and infrastructure investment, including funding for…
Discussion regarding military specification aviation fuel
Support funding for air traffic improvements, human space flight technology, aviation propulsion technologies…
Support funding for air traffic improvements, human space flight technology, aviation propulsion technologies…
Support funding for air traffic improvements, human space flight technology, aviation propulsion technologies…
Support funding for air traffic improvements, human space flight technology, aviation propulsion technologies…
S 2625/HR 4367 - Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2024 including issues related to Coast Guard…
S (not yet introduced)/HR 8774 - Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2025 including issues related to aircraft…
Support funding for air traffic improvements, human space flight technology, aviation propulsion technologies…
Support funding for air traffic improvements, human space flight technology, aviation propulsion technologies…
Support funding for air traffic improvements, human space flight technology, aviation propulsion technologies…
Support funding for air traffic improvements, human space flight technology, aviation propulsion technologies…
Oversight
Department-level designation (not specific to this program)
GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Aviation Improvements. No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.
Program dossier
No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →
Primary sources
Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.
Budget totals · TOA sources
FY2026 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J468
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2026_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2017 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J418
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2017_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2018 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J450
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2018_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2019 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J469
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2019_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2020 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J480
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2020_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2021 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J489
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2021_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2022 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J455
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2022_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2023 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J448
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2023_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2024 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J442
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2024_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2025 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J450
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2025_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
Detailed budget justification
The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.
RDTEN BA1-3 Book · www.secnav.navy.mil