Fiscal Receipts

Safety Program Management

MDARDT&EPartial Reconciliation0202057C
What it is
Safety Program Management (0202057C) is a MDA research & development line funded in the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide account. Its J-book detail breaks the line into 1 project.
What changed
+$35.0K FY25→26 R-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No award linkage at high confidence.

Budget Figures

FY24 Actuals
$2.48MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Total
$1.77MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$1.81MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
+$35.0KR-1 TOA · PB2026

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget Trajectory
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order so the direction of travel is readable at a glance: this line ends lower than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order so the direction of travel is readable at a glance: this line ends lower than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $2.48MFY25: $1.77MFY26: $1.81MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$2.48M
FY25$1.77M
FY26$1.81M

All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view — P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
7 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2020–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
7 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2020–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2020 actuals — PB2022 editionFY2021 actuals — PB2023 editionFY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2021 enacted — PB2022 editionFY2022 enacted — PB2023 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2022 request — PB2022 editionFY2023 request — PB2023 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$0$0$2.32M$2.44M$2.48M
Enacted–$0$2.32M$2.42M$2.48M$1.77M
Request––$2.32M$2.42M$2.48M$1.77M$1.81M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2023 book requested $2.42M for FY2023; the PB2025 book reported $2.44M as actual total obligation authority — $25.0K above the request. 2.4 − 2.4 = 0.0 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program Lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission — Safety Program Management

The Missile Defense Agency (MDA) Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) establishes the program plans, policy, responsibilities, and guidelines for compliance with statutory, regulatory, and Department of Defense (DoD) policy/program directives. It also establishes MDA OSH programs designed for the protection of human resources through accident prevention; protection of MDA systems, property, and equipment; and the compliance with appropriate statutes, regulations, Executive Orders, and DoD policies. OSH develops and ensures implementation of safety requirements, mitigates safety risks to the lowest practical level, and ensures a safe workplace for all MDA employees and contractors by implementing a Safety and Occupational Health program.

Mission — Safety Program Management

The Missile Defense Agency (MDA) Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) establishes the program plans, policy, responsibilities, and guidelines for compliance with statutory, regulatory, and Department of Defense (DoD) policy/program directives. It also establishes MDA OSH programs designed for the protection of human resources through accident prevention; protection of MDA systems, property, and equipment; and the compliance with appropriate statutes, regulations, Executive Orders, and DoD policies. OSH develops and ensures implementation of safety requirements, mitigates safety risks to the lowest practical level, and ensures a safe workplace for all MDA employees and contractors by implementing a Safety and Occupational Health program.

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (1)

Safety Program Management

The OSH program ensures that all employees are provided a safe and healthful workplace through an aggressive initiative of workplace inspections, audits, and accident investigation processes. The unique accomplishments to each fiscal year are as follows:

Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideMDAFY24 Actuals$2.48M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideMDAFY25 Enacted$1.77M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideMDAFY25 Total$1.77M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideMDAFY26 Disc. Request$1.81M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideMDAFY26 Total$1.81M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget Figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$4.76M$2.48M$1.77M$1.81M$1.81M
MDSH: Safety Program Management$4.76M$2.48M$1.77M$1.81M$1.81M

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 1,741 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Awards

No awards are linked to this program element at high confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.

Lobbying Mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Safety Program Management — no program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →

Primary Sources