Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Physical Security Systems (OPA3)

ArmyProcurementPartial ReconciliationBLI0050MA0780
What it is
Physical Security Systems (OPA3) (0050MA0780) is an Army procurement line funded in the Other Procurement, Army account.
What changed
-$2.14M FY25→26 P-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No single contractor is published as this line's leader. 3 linked award records are listed below. This line's high-confidence links do not clear the floor for a published concentration index — at least 3 awards across 2 contractor families holding positive obligations, with positive net linked dollars. Why the crosswalk is partial.

Budget figures

FY24 Actuals
$128.1MP-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Enacted
$138.5MP-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$136.3MP-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
-$2.14MP-1 TOA · PB2026
Data coverage

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget trajectory

The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $128.1MFY25: $138.5MFY26: $136.3MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$128.1M
FY25$138.5M
FY26$136.3M

All series figures: P-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view

P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition

5 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2022–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
5 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2022–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$100.3M$123.8M$128.1M
Enacted–$126.7M$132.7M$138.5M
Request––$132.7M$138.5M$136.3M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2024 book requested $132.7M for FY2024; the PB2026 book reported $128.1M as actual total obligation authority — $4.66M below the request. 128.08 − 132.74 = -4.66 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Description — Physical Security Systems (OPA3)

The Physical Security program's goal is to safeguard Army installations, stand-alone facilities, activities, operations, personnel and critical assets from sabotage, espionage, criminal, terrorists and insider threats. The Physical Security program reduces risks and vulnerabilities by providing Commanders with the appropriate levels of protection through the use of technology to ensure Army readiness to generate, project, and sustain Army forces. The Integrated Commercial Intrusion Detection System (ICIDS) program (MA0781) is a Force Protection System Program of Record (PoR) that consists of commercially available interior and exterior sensors, response, entry control, electronic surveillance and command and control devices. ICIDS protects critical national assets, sensitive compartmented information facilities, conventional munitions storage areas, non-nuclear missiles and rockets in a ready to fire configuration, sensitive munitions and other mission essential assets. ICIDS provides the capability for Commanders to detect, assess and respond to unauthorized entry or attempted intrusion into their facilities. The system provides security to Units, Installations and Facilities while minimizing the number of security guards required. Additionally, the item includes ICIDS at new or modified facilities. ICIDS supports a balanced investment strategy for the Army approved force structure and requirements. Note, ICIDS cost per Installation varies by quantity (20 to 1000) and type (i.e., bunker, bio lab, arms room, chemical weapons storage, SCIF) of security zones. Commercial Intrusion Detection Systems (CIDS) (MA0782) provides commercially available intrusion detection systems (IDS) at locations which fielding of ICIDS is not practical. CIDS protects conventional arms, ammunition and explosive storage facilities, sensitive compartment information facilities, areas designed as mission essential and vulnerable and other high risk targets as required by Army policy. This program supports unit readiness by reducing Unit and Installation vulnerability and supports the upgrades of the IDS for arms, ammunition and explosives arms vaults and ammunition supply point bunkers for Active, National Guard and US Army Reserve sites, to meet Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) 4-021-02 compliance. Additionally, the item includes IDSs at new or modified facilities. CIDS protects personnel, facilities and equipment from terrorist or criminal threats. Other Physical Security Measures Equipment (MA0783) includes the Automated Installation Entry (AIE) system which complies with DoDM 5200.08, VOL 3 direction to field Electronic Physical Access Control Systems (ePACs) to accomplish initial and continuous vetting of visitors and all registered personnel entering Army installations. AIE satisfies Public Law 110-181, Section 1069; Public Law 114-92, Section 1086; DoD; and US Army Automated Access Control Requirements. Note: AIE cost per Installation varies by quantity (1 to 60) and type (i.e., handheld only, self-service pedestal, RFID enabled, Facial Recognition enabled) of inbound/ ingress lanes and number (1 to 3) of Visitor Control Centers. MA0783 also includes other physical security requirements such as CCTV systems and physical security systems and equipment for modernizing access control points. Note: These are non-standard programs and do not have AAO's.

Justification

Justification — Physical Security Systems (OPA3)

FY 2026 Base procurement funding in the amount of $136.315 million provides funding for ICIDS (MA0781) in the amount of $26.915 million; CIDS (MA0782) in the amount of $22.316 million; and Other Physical Security Measures Equipment (MA0783) in the amount of $87.084 million. Fiscal Year (FY) 2026 Overseas Operations Costs accounted for in the Base budget total $136,315 thousand. MA0781 - ($26.915 million) PEO Intelligence, Electronic Warfare and Sensors (PEO IEW&S) - ($17.303 million) - FY 2026 Base procurement dollars provides installation of ICIDS at Anniston Army Depot, Ft Detrick, Redstone Arsenal, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Hawthorne, and Tooele; and Windows 11 conversions for non-compliant ICIDS. Funding supports a balanced investment strategy for the Army approved force structure and requirements. All ICIDS quantities and funding are for Active Components. Other Organizations US Army Material Command - ($1.156 million) - FY 2026 base funding to support intrusion detection systems for construction at new facilities. Joint Program Executive Office (JPEO) - ($1.285 million) - FY 2026 base funding to support intrusion detection systems for construction at new facilities. US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) - ($0.501 million) - FY 2026 base funding to support intrusion detection systems for construction at new facilities. US Army Central Command (USARCENT) - ($6.670 million) - FY 2026 base funding to support intrusion detection systems for construction at new facilities to support the enduring requirement for Operation Spartan Shield. MA0782 - ($22.316 million) OFC, SEC OF THE ARMY, Resources Services Washington (RSW) ($13.221 million) - Procurement for CIDS (MA0782) base procurement dollars supports procuring 389 sites and 11 Ammunition Supply Points to modernized integrated physical security equipment for intrusion detection and assessment, access control, electronic surveillance and force protection equipment at existing National Guard Facilities and some Active Army sites. Funding provides security measures for conventional arms, ammunition and explosive storage facilities, sensitive compartment information facilities and other areas containing assets for which policy requires Intrusion Detection Systems. Risks and vulnerabilities are minimized by providing Commanders with the appropriate levels of protection through the use of available technology to safeguard personnel and Army assets. Funding supports a balanced investment strategy for the Army's approved force structure and requirements. All quantities and funding are for Active, USAR and ARNG Components. US Army Reserve Command (USARC) ($2.950 million) - Procurement for CIDS (MA0782) base procurement dollars supports modernization of Intrusion Detection System (IDS) panels, motion sensors, seismic sensors, and balance magnetic switches at 50 sites throughout the 88th Readiness Division Region, sites are primarily located in Illinois, Missouri, Kansas, and Iowa. Funding provides security measures for conventional arms, ammunition and explosive storage facilities, sensitive compartmented information facilities and other areas containing assets for which policy requires Intrusion Detection Systems. The current system requires a cybersecurity POAM for compliance creating a security vulnerability that cannot be mitigated without modernization efforts. Risks and vulnerabilities are minimized by providing Commanders with the appropriate levels of protection through the use of available technology to safeguard personnel and Army assets. US Army Material Command - ($2.410 million) - FY 2026 base funding to support intrusion detection systems for construction at new facilities. Army National Guard - ($3.431 million) - FY 2026 base funding to support intrusion detection systems for construction at new facilities. US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) - ($0.304 million) - FY 2026 base funding to support intrusion detection systems for construction at new facilities. MA0783 - ($87.084 million) PEO Intelligence, Electronic Warfare and Sensors (PEO IEW&S) ($31.349M) - Base procurement dollars of $22.746 million supports fielding AIE systems to 14 installations. Systems will include technological enhancements to protect Army force projection platforms and high priority Installations. All quantities and funding are for Active, Reserve and ARNG Components. $3.080 million procures Facial Recognition and other software related technological enhancements. $5.523 procures AIE program management support and SETA contract support. Other Organizations US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) ($19.266 million) - Access Control Point (ACP) Physical Security Equipment Modernization - procures ACP equipment for 4 Installations: Ft Lee, Ft Stewart, Ft Bliss, Yuma Proving Ground and AIE Site Preparation at multiple remaining Installations. Army Training Doctrine and Command (TRADOC) ($28.750 million) - Separate and Secure is a TRADOC program created to address and improve security in the Trainee Barracks (e.g., Basic Combat Training, Advanced Individual Training, and One Station Unit Training) at Ft Benning, Ft Jackson, Ft Leonard Wood, Ft Sill, Ft Gordon, Ft Huachuca, Ft Lee, Ft Rucker, JB Langley Eustis and JB San Antonio. Standardized camera systems will further deter Sexual Harassment Response, and Prevention related incidents within the barracks. US Military Academy (USMA) ($0.822 million) - Funding for procurement of electronic security other than IDS procures CCTV and access control systems associated with life-cycle hardware replacement for 1 facility at USMA Preparatory School. CCTV enhances security to meet Superintendent's priority to ensure the safety of the Corps of Cadets, staff & faculty, families, and visitors and deters/mitigates the active shooter threat, SHARP, and larceny/vandalism. Access control systems reduce vulnerability and prevents unauthorized access to restricted entry facilities and mitigates threat of active shooter incidents in the MEVA. US Army Material Command - ($2.411 million) - FY 2026 base funding to support intrusion detection systems for construction at new facilities. Army National Guard - ($3.319 million) - FY 2026 base funding to support intrusion detection systems for construction at new facilities. OFC, SEC OF THE ARMY, Resources Services Washington (RSW) - ($1.167 million) - funds Defense Biometric Identification System (DBIDS) to support install and upgrade for DBIDS. In accordance with section 1815 of the FY 2008 National Defense Authorization Act (P.L. 110 - 181), this item is necessary for use by the active and reserve components of the Armed Forces for homeland defense missions, domestic emergency responses, and providing military support to civil authorities.

Budget line items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit P-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Other Procurement, ArmyAFY24 Actuals$128.1M
Other Procurement, ArmyAFY25 Enacted$138.5M
Other Procurement, ArmyAFY26 Disc. Request$136.3M
Other Procurement, ArmyAFY26 Total$136.3M

Exhibit P-1R

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Other Procurement, ArmyAFY 2026 request$6.79M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$2.46B$128.1M$138.5M$133.0M$136.3M

Follow the dollar

No follow-the-dollar view — none of this program's high-confidence awards records a positive obligation at any place of performance (flows cover 312 of 1,938 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Related awards

Award linkage is shown for 32 of 200 profiled companies — high- and medium-confidence USAspending matches, each row labeled; medium is the weaker evidence. why partial award coverage? →

RecipientPIIDConfidence
LEIDOS, INC.W909MY24D0001high
LEIDOS, INC.W911QY15D0047high
MINUTEMAN SECURITY SOLUTIONS LLCW911QY16D0025high

Contractor concentration

No concentration index is published for this line. This line's high-confidence links do not clear the floor for a published concentration index — at least 3 awards across 2 contractor families holding positive obligations, with positive net linked dollars. An index below that floor is a fact about the sample, not about the market. Whatever further links this line carries are medium-confidence, and what each medium evidence path does and does not establish is set out in the methodology. Both bases are in the downloadable warehouse.

Lobbying mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Physical Security Systems (OPA3). No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

Program dossier

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →

Primary sources

Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.

Budget totals · TOA sources

Detailed budget justification

The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.